I was not aware that "the plan" had evolved into a 1:1 mapping between ports
you usually use in cleartext and ports you usually use enciphered.
So, if my exit has TCP 19 open ... what will you accept as a suitably secure
chargen ? What about 37 ? I don't know of a standalone time protocol that
is encrypted ...
Since there is not a clear 1:1 mapping of cleartext and not ports (we _can_
agree on that, right ?) then I suppose some system of "weights" will have to
be applied. How would this weigh out:
21, 23, 25, 53, 1337, 2105, 5555, 32245
There are four TCP ports that you usually use cleartext, and four that you
usually use encrypted ... is that exit policy acceptable ? Or do you assign
different weights based on how well you know the protocols ? I've sure never
heard of "MMTSG-mutualed over MMT (encrypted transmission)" so ... I'd assue
a low weight.
But then what about the malicious operator that takes a few seconds to post
to or-talk and "explains" their exit policy that didn't weight out properly
... then what ? Is it a panel of three ? A panel of five ? Are there
appeals ?